"Dear Bharatgas Consumer, to avail LPG Subsidy in your bank account, kindly submit Your Aadhar to your Distributor and to your Bank immediataly."
29-10-2013
05:08:39 AM
TD-BPCLMS
आज तड़के सुबह प्राप्त यह sms केंद्र सरकार की सुप्रीम कोर्ट को दी गई सूचना को झुठलाता है।10 अक्तूबर 2013 को 'द हिन्दू' में प्रकाशित समाचार के अनुसार पेट्रोलियम एवं प्रकृतिक गैस मंत्री वीरप्पा मोइली ने पत्रकारों के समक्ष स्पष्ट किया था कि,:
“Aadhaar is only an identification card. We will not make it mandatory unless the Supreme Court gives clearance,” Mr. Moily told reporters here.
वास्तविक स्थिति यह है :
The Aadhaar scheme is unconstitutional as applicants are required to
part with personal information on biometrics, iris and fingerprints,
infringing their right to privacy, which is held part of the fundamental
right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution, Justice K.S.
Puttaswamy, retired judge of the Karnataka High Court, and other
petitioners told the Supreme Court.
“There are no safeguards or penalties and no legislative backing for obtaining personal information, and the proposed law introduced by the government has been rejected by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance. Provisions for collection and retention of biometric data have been held impermissible in the United Kingdom and France by their top courts.”
http://www.kractivist.org/india-aadhaar-scheme-is-unconstitutional-justice-k-s-puttaswamy-uid/
..................................................................................................
29-10-2013
05:08:39 AM
TD-BPCLMS
आज तड़के सुबह प्राप्त यह sms केंद्र सरकार की सुप्रीम कोर्ट को दी गई सूचना को झुठलाता है।10 अक्तूबर 2013 को 'द हिन्दू' में प्रकाशित समाचार के अनुसार पेट्रोलियम एवं प्रकृतिक गैस मंत्री वीरप्पा मोइली ने पत्रकारों के समक्ष स्पष्ट किया था कि,:
“Aadhaar is only an identification card. We will not make it mandatory unless the Supreme Court gives clearance,” Mr. Moily told reporters here.
वास्तविक स्थिति यह है :
The Ministry had unveiled the scheme in 97 districts and planned to
extend it to almost 265 districts by January 1, under which all
consumers in these districts had to get their bank accounts linked with
their Aadhaar number to avail themselves of the subsidy. The Aadhaar
platform, which provides a resident a 12-digit unique number after
recording bio-metric information like fingerprints and iris, is being
used to implement the cash transfer scheme.
But the Supreme Court ruled that Aadhaar could not be made mandatory for
people to get government services and nobody should be deprived of any
such facilities for want of the card. It also rejected the review
petition filed by the government on this issue.
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/aadhaar-not-mandatory-for-lpg-subsidy-moily/article5217892.ece
टाटा डोकोमो की मार्फत 'भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड मोबाईल सर्विसेज' द्वारा आज 29 अक्तूबर 2013 की तड़के सुबह 5 बज कर 8 मिनट 39 सेकेंड पर भेजा गया sms तो मंत्री जी की घोषणा और सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की व्यवस्था का खुला उल्लंघन एवं राष्ट्र की सार्व भौमिकता को बेचे जाने की पुष्टि करता है।
इसी ब्लाग में 18 अक्तूबर एवं 21 अक्तूबर को निम्नलिखित विषयों पर जनता को आगाह किया गया था जिसकी सूचना सांसद कामरेड गुरुदास दासगुप्ता जी की फेसबुक वाल पर भी अन्य बड़े कामरेड्स के साथ-साथ दी गई थी। किन्तु अफसोस कि हमारे कामरेड्स नेतृत्व को भी मनमोहन सरकार के संकटमोचक मुलायम सिंह जी को उनके विकल्प मे पी एम बनवाने की तो पड़ी है किन्तु देश की सुरक्षा और सार्व भौमिकता के लिए खतरा बन चुके 'आधार कार्ड' योजना को सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की आपत्ति के बावजूद रद्द करवाने की कोई तत्परता नहीं है।
The Aadhaar scheme is unconstitutional---Justice K.S. Puttaswamy
“There are no safeguards or penalties and no legislative backing for obtaining personal information, and the proposed law introduced by the government has been rejected by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance. Provisions for collection and retention of biometric data have been held impermissible in the United Kingdom and France by their top courts.”
http://www.kractivist.org/india-aadhaar-scheme-is-unconstitutional-justice-k-s-puttaswamy-uid/
Attack on India's sovereignty and democracy---S.G.Vombatkere
Spying-snooping-scrutiny
Edward Snowden’s expose caused
international outrage for
NSA infringing on individual privacy, and on friends and foes alike at
governmental and public levels. USA’s NATO allies were vocal in their
feigned outrage at the revelation that their cyberspace had been
secretly invaded by NSA, even their embassies bugged, and data mining
performed on their official and private citizens’ communications. True
to this writer’s prediction that “there is unlikely to be even a squeak
on this sovereignty issue” [Ref.3], India, far from even feigning
outrage, has sought to play down USA’s presidentially-sanctioned spying,
snooping and surveillance by terming it as “scrutiny” of India’s
cyberspace. However, even “scrutiny”, the mildest of the terms [Note 2],
is objectionable because it impinges on India’s
sovereignty.................................................................................................................................................................................
Surveillance and security
Surveillance by USA on India’s leaders and private citizens
is bad enough, but India is preparing for its own internal
surveillance. Surveillance assumes that the subject surveilled is a
suspected spy or a criminal [Note 2]. This assumption for general public
surveillance in a democracy is unwarranted because the general public
becomes “suspect”. Surveillance of criminal suspects (targetted
surveillance) is standard police and intelligence practice and, in a
democratic society, is done with appropriate established, well-defined
checks and safeguards, so that the power of surveillance is not misused
to gain advantage or blackmail or settle scores for political or
partisan purposes. Even with checks and balances in place, targetted
surveillance has led to innumerable cases of staged or false
“encounters” resulting in extra-judicial killings based on questionable
intelligence reports, mere suspicion or motivated political orders.